Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • David Huddle, Washington, D.C., (appointed by this court) for
  • Richard W. Barton,
  • Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Chester H. Gray,
  • Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal
  • Counsel,
  • Hubert B. Pair,
  • Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • David Huddle, Washington, D.C., (appointed by this court) for
  • Richard W. Barton,
  • Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Chester H. Gray,
  • Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal
  • Counsel,
  • Hubert B. Pair,
  • Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

John E. CAUL, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee. Phillip M. COGGINS, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants were convicted of committing a lewd, obscene or indecent act. Code 1951, § 22-1112(a) (Supp. VIII).

A review of the record demonstrates that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the convictions.

Court-appointed counsel is commended for the able service he rendered in these cases.

Reversed with instructions to enter judgments of acquittal. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

CAUL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
(Oct 13, 1960)