AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RICH PLAN OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman M. HAWTHORNE, Defendant-Appellant.

TATE, Judge.

The appellant did not appear in person or through counsel when this case was called for argument on the date it had been docketed for hearing, nor was any brief filed on his behalf. The appeal is therefore considered abandoned, and it will accordingly be dismissed. Rule VII, Section 4(b), Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal. See also: Wyatt v. Wyatt, 232 La. 467, 94 So.2d 439; Brumfield v. Giles, 231 La. 85, 90 So.2d 786, 787; Daunis v. Maryland Cas. Co., La. App. 2 Cir., 115 So.2d 225; Mitchell v. Martin, La. App. 1 Cir., 86 So.2d 211; Pharis v. Jowers, La. App. 2 Cir., 85 So.2d 389.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RICH PLAN OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA, INC., v. HAWTHORNE
(Nov 17, 1960)