AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Morris ZELTZERMAN et al., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court of the United States which the taxpayer here asks us to review rests upon that court's disposition of a disputed issue of fact. It will suffice for us to say that an examination of the evidence completely satisfies us that the Tax Court's finding is certainly not "clearly erroneous." Title 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a), Rule 52(a) F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.

Judgment will be entered affirming the decision of the Tax Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ZELTZERMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
(Nov 18, 1960)