AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MUZAK CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellant, v. GEORGE G. TRATTNER, Appellant-Respondent

Per Curiam.

The contract provided for liquidated damages in the event defendant cancelled the agreement at the end of any yearly period. The provision for liquidated damages did not constitute a penalty. Its effect is to compensate plaintiff for permitting defendant to terminate his contractual obligations ( McCready v. Lindenborn, 172 N.Y. 400; Norris v. McMechen, 135 Misc. 361; Silver Dresses, v. Parker, 73 N.Y.S.2d 704).

The judgment should be modified by increasing the recovery to $430.83, with interest and costs, and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to plaintiff.

Concur — HECHT, J.P., STEUER and TILZER, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MUZAK CORPORATION v. TRATTNER
(Dec 1, 1960)