Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of LUCILLE BOSS, Appellant, v. JOSEPH J. CAPUTA, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent, and CHARLENE GRENARD, Inter

Order affirmed, with costs to the State Rent Administrator: no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD and FOSTER. Judges FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum: We find ourselves unable to acquiesce in this inconsistent approach to decontrol, whereby the upper and lower portions of a single building, renovated as part of one over-all scheme, are severed and treated differently for purposes of decontrol. The statute when fairly read in the light of the salutary policy which impelled its enactment dictates that full decontrol should be here granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BOSS v. CAPUTA
(Nov 30, 1960)