Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Nachod, Appellant, v. Nachod.

Appeals — Appealable order — Order certifying equity action to law side of court — Procedure — Pa. R. C. P. 1550(10) — Acts of June 7, 1907, P. L. 440 and March 5, 1925, P. L. 23.

1. An order certifying an action in equity to the law side of the court is a non-appealable interlocutory order.

2. The Act of June 7, 1907, P. L. 440, § 2, under which such an order was appealable, has been suspended by Rule 1550(10) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure.

OPINION PER CURIAM, December 15, 1960:

This appeal is from an order certifying the suit in equity to the law side of the court. In taking the appeal, the plaintiff relied for authorization upon Section 2 of the Act of June 7, 1907, P. L. 440, 12 Pa.C.S.A. § 1228. But that section of the Act of 1907 has been suspended by Rule 1550(10) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure: Korona v. Bensalem Township, 385 Pa. 283, 284, 122 A.2d 688. The appeal is, therefore, premature as having been taken from an interlocutory order which has not been made appealable by statute: see Section 4 of the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 Pa.C.S.A. § 675.

Appeal dismissed at appellant's costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NACHOD v. NACHOD
(Dec 15, 1960)