Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Maurice M. Jansky
  • Carl H. Imlay, Washington, D.C., for
  • Mr. Philip G. Loucks, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for
  • Mr. Richard M. Zwolinski, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, with whom
  • John L. FitzGerald,
  • Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Max D. Paglin,
  • Counsel, Federal Communications Commission,
  • Richard A. Solomon,
  • of Justice, were on the brief, for
Judges
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • David L. Bazelon
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Maurice M. Jansky
  • Carl H. Imlay, Washington, D.C., for
  • Mr. Philip G. Loucks, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for
  • Mr. Richard M. Zwolinski, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, with whom
  • John L. FitzGerald,
  • Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Max D. Paglin,
  • Counsel, Federal Communications Commission,
  • Richard A. Solomon,
  • of Justice, were on the brief, for
Judges
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • David L. Bazelon
See more information ...
Smart Summary

INTERSTATE BROADCASTING COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES of America, and Federal Communications Commission, Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Interstate Broadcasting Co. v. United States of America, and Federal Communications Comm., 109 U.S.App.D.C. ___, 286 F.2d 539, the Commission's order denying intervention is reversed and the Commission is directed to allow Interstate to intervene in its proceedings.

So ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

INTERSTATE BROADCASTING CO. v. UNITED STATES
(Dec 22, 1960)