Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DIA-LOG COMPANY, a Di v. sion of the Ford Alexander Corporation,

SAMUEL, Judge.

The appellant did not make an appearance when this case was regularly called for argument, nor has he filed a brief herein. The appellee alone has appeared and he has submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed.

Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court, that judgment may be affirmed under the presumption that it is correct. Perkins v. Buchler, 223 La. 179, 65 So.2d 130; Succession of Bailey, 232 La. 824, 95 So.2d 326; Alice v. Woods, La. App., 124 So.2d 770 and Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead, La. App., 124 So.2d 776, both handed down by us on December 5, 1960, and not yet reported.

We have examined the record and find no error of law or fact patent on the face thereof.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, appellant to pay all costs.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DIA-LOG COMPANY v. PARETI
(Jan 23, 1961)