Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

REEVES v. CITY OF ATLANTA.

QUILLIAN, Justice.

1. Where the City of Atlanta, on July 5, 1960, under the provisions of the act of 1957 (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 387 et seq.; Code Ann. § 36-601a et seq.), instituted condemnation proceedings to acquire a perpetual easement over a private alley for use in connection with a fire-department station, and the superior court referred the matter to a named special master, the owner of the private alley could not by petition for injunction, brought on July 20, 1960, defeat the condemnation proceeding or litigate the issue that the property sought to be condemned was being condemned for private rather than public purposes. Such issue must be litigated in the condemnation proceeding, and the trial court did not err in dissolving the original restraining order and in refusing the temporary injunction prayed. Johnson v. Fulton County, 216 Ga. 498 ( 117 S.E.2d 155); Fulton County v. Aronson, 216 Ga. 497 ( 117 S.E.2d 166); Mitchell v. State Highway Dept., 216 Ga. 517 ( 118 S.E.2d 88).

2. This judgment is not to be construed as in any way affecting the rights of the parties to the condemnation proceeding. The status of each issue is as though this suit had never been instituted, and any pleadings that could have initially been filed in the condemnation proceedings may now be filed in the same.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED JANUARY 10, 1961 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 9, 1961.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REEVES v. CITY OF ATLANTA
(Feb 9, 1961)