Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Commonwealth ex rel. Dudley, Appellant v. Healey.

Criminal Law — Practice — Habeas corpus — Moot question — Alleged trial errors — Sentence completely served.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, in which it appeared that relator had completely served a sentence imposed following conviction on an indictment; that he alleged trial errors in the proceedings on this indictment; that he was serving a sentence subsequently imposed on another indictment; and that the court below, holding that the questions raised in the petition for the writ were moot, denied the petition; it was Held that the order of the court below should be affirmed.

Submitted March 6, 1961.

OPINION PER CURIAM, March 13, 1961:

The Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County is affirmed on the opinion of Judge FRANK L. PINOLA for the court below, reported at 23 Pa D. C. 2d 799.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COM. ex rel. DUDLEY v. HEALEY
(Mar 13, 1961)