Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Commonwealth v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Appellant.

Taxation — Foreign corporations — Corporate net income tax — Tax base — Income from royalties and technical fees — Multiform or unitary business.

Where the taxpayer, a foreign corporation, contended that in computing its corporate net income tax, income from royalties and technical fees should be excluded from the tax base upon the ground that it is engaged in a multiform business, but the court below concluded that the taxpayer's business is unitary in character and that the royalties and technical fees had been properly included in the tax base, it was Held that the judgment against the taxpayer should be affirmed.

OPINION PER CURIAM, March 13, 1961:

The judgment of the Court below is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge KARL E. RICHARDS.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COM. v. MINN. M. MFG. CO
(Mar 13, 1961)