Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WHITE CASTLE SYSTEM, INC., APPELLEE v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT.

`Taxation — Sales tax — Items used or consumed directly in making retail sales — Function of Board of Tax Appeals — Court will not substitute its judgment for that of board — Questions of fact — Decision affirmed where not unreasonable or unlawful.

Per Curiam.

The Board of Tax Appeals, as an administrative appellate board, has, in its decision, applied to the factual situation in this cause certain rules laid down by this court in construing the above-quoted section and has arrived at the conclusion above stated. It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals on such factual issues but only to determine from an examination of the record whether the decision reached by the board is unreasonable or unlawful.

From an examination of the entire record, this court is unable to find that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable or unlawful. The decision is, therefore, affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., TAFT, MATTHIAS and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.

HERBERT, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHITE CASTLE v. BOWERS
(Apr 19, 1961)