Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GRAHL, APPELLEE v. MATTHEWS, APPELLANT.

Appeal — Final order — Sustaining demurrer to one defense of answer — Not final appealable order, when — No judgment taken against defendant — No refusal to plead further.

Per Curiam.

The defendant did not permit judgment to be taken against her or refuse to plead further. The sustaining of the motion to strike a part of the amended answer, considering such motion as a demurrer, leaves the cause still pending in the trial court. The order of the trial court, considering the motion to strike the second defense from the amended answer as a demurrer and sustaining it, is not a final order from which an appeal may be taken. Holbrook, Admr., v. Connelly, 6 Ohio St. 199.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.

HERBERT, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GRAHL v. MATTHEWS
(Apr 19, 1961)