Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RALPH WESLEY PUCKETT,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The opinion was delivered PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division affirming his conviction of unlawful possession of narcotics in violation of R.S. 24:18-4. As to the issues raised before the Appellate Division, we agree with its determination for the reasons expressed in its opinion reported in 67 N.J. Super. 365 (1960). The additional arguments advanced by the defendant on this appeal were considered and rejected by this court today in State v. Reed, 34 N.J. 554 (1961). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. PUCKETT
(May 8, 1961)