STUART v. MEEKER

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 16060.

Attorney(S)

Mr. J. Robert Carey, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Michael F. Keogh and John F. Costello, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. John F. Burke, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellants. Mr. John L. Ingoldsby, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Patrick J. Head, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Judges

Wilbur Kingsbury Miller
Henry White Edgerton
Elijah Barrett Prettyman

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 16060.

Attorney(S)

Mr. J. Robert Carey, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Michael F. Keogh and John F. Costello, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. John F. Burke, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellants. Mr. John L. Ingoldsby, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Patrick J. Head, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Judges

Wilbur Kingsbury Miller
Henry White Edgerton
Elijah Barrett Prettyman

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

Edward M. STUART and The John E. Stuart Company, Appellants, v. Theodore C. MEEKER, doing business as Tri-State Engineering Ser

PER CURIAM.

The parties had been partners in an air conditioning business. Stuart sold his interest to Meeker and agreed that for two years he would not "interfere" with Meeker's business, but would work for him as a part-time employee. Meeker sued Stuart for alleged violations of the dissolution agreement and was awarded damages and other relief. Stuart appeals.

We accept the trial court's interpretation of the dissolution agreement, and are of the opinion that the evidence supported its decision.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Edward M. STUART and The John E. Stuart Company, Appellants, v. Theodore C. MEEKER, doing business as Tri-State Engineering Ser

Comments