Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Strassner v. Trainor, Appellant.

Practice — Stay of execution — Ejectment — Judgment.

In this appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff on the pleadings in an action of ejectment, the judgment was affirmed subject to a stay of execution for a specified period in order to afford the defendant an opportunity to institute an appropriate proceeding in the orphans' court for the adjudication of her claim of alleged right to the ownership of the realty.

OPINION BY MR. CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, May 22, 1961:

The judgment in ejectment in favor of the plaintiff administrator, entered by the court below subsequent to its having sustained the administrator's preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to the defendant's answer to the complaint, is affirmed, subject, however, to a stay of execution thereon for a period of sixty days in order to afford defendant an opportunity to institute an appropriate proceeding in the Orphans' Court of Philadelphia County for the adjudication of her claim of alleged right to the ownership of the realty in question. If such proceeding in the Orphans' Court is duly instituted by the defendant, the stay herewith imposed shall continue thereafter until the matter has been finally disposed of by the Orphans' Court or until such other time as that court may prescribe.

Judgment in ejectment affirmed with limited stay of execution.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STRASSNER v. TRAINOR
(May 22, 1961)