Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BAKER v. SACKS, WARDEN.

Habeas corpus — Not proper remedy to review irregularities in sentencing an accused.

Per Curiam.

Habeas corpus cannot be used to review alleged irregularities in the resentencing of an accused by a court of competent jurisdiction. Ex parte Shaw, 7 Ohio St. 81; Ex parte Hagan, 25 Ohio St. 426.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, BELL, RADCLIFF and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.

RADCLIFF, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of HERBERT, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BAKER v. SACKS, WARDEN
(Jun 14, 1961)