AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

BEATRICE R. BRINKMAN, Respondent, v. BERNARD BRINKMAN, Appellant.

In an action by the wife for a judicial separation, the husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 27, 1961, which referred to an Official Referee to hear and report (or to hear and determine if both parties consent), a motion by the wife to punish the husband for contempt by reason of his failure to pay arrears in alimony, and a cross motion by the husband to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution and for other relief. Appeal dismissed, without costs, on the grounds: (1) that plaintiff has not consented that an Official Referee hear and determine the motions; and (2) that an order referring a matter to an Official Referee to hear and report is not appealable ( Rayex Corp. v. Sanchez, 6 A.D.2d 903; Cameron v. Cameron, 2 A.D.2d 979; Newcomb v. Newcomb, 281 App. Div. 689; Bazel v. Bazel, 282 App. Div. 952, and cases therein cited). Beldock, Acting P.J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRINKMAN v. BRINKMAN
(Jun 26, 1961)