Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE EDWARDS.

Attorneys at law — Disciplinary action — Indefinite suspension — Petition for reinstatement — Conduct disqualifying petitioner for reinstatement.

Per Curiam.

After an examination of the entire proceedings, this court is of the opinion that petitioner does not possess the qualifications which would entitle him to admission to the practice of law.

Accordingly, the petition for reinstatement is denied, and the report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline is disapproved.

Report disapproved and judgment accordingly.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, RADCLIFF and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.

RADCLIFF, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of HERBERT, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE EDWARDS
(Jul 5, 1961)