Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FRANKLIN NATIONAL BANK OF LONG ISLAND, Plaintiff, v. BUSH HOMES, INC., et al., Defendants

MARIO PITTONI, J.

Motion for summary judgment in an action (1) on notes for $455,000, and (2) on the guarantee of said notes.

Thirteen notes executed between November 25, 1960 and March 1, 1961 by defendant Bush Homes, Inc. (with guarantees of payment by the remaining defendants) have not been paid. Payment of all was accelerated when payment of three notes was not made on their due dates. Each note contains a provision for a 20% attorney's fee.

As in the companion action, decided herewith, the defendants plead usury in the provision for a 20% fee. That defense has not been sustained ( General Lbr. Corp. v. Landa, 13 A.D.2d 804 [2d Dept.]). Gair v. Peck ( 6 N.Y.2d 97), cited by defendants, is not in point. That case involved contingent fees between attorneys and clients in negligence actions, not added percentages to the amounts of notes payable, according to contract between the parties, by the losing party for legal services required by the winner to prevail. Nor may the defendants plead or rely on any oral agreement to extend the time of payment of the notes. ( Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Palmer, 13 A.D.2d 772 [2d Dept.].) Motion is granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FRANKLIN NAT. BANK v. BUSH HOMES
(Aug 31, 1961)