Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HARLEY et al. v. HARLEY.

HEAD, Presiding Justice.

Under the facts of this case, the discharge of the resident defendant did not divest the court of jurisdiction of the two nonresident defendants, since the nonresident defendants waived the right to object to venue when, after the discharge of the resident defendant, they filed an additional pleading to the merits. Hudgins Contracting Co. v. Redmond, 178 Ga. 317 ( 173 S.E. 135); Burger v. Noble, 81 Ga. App. 759 ( 59 S.E.2d 761); 92 C.J.S. 820-822, § 124; 56 Am Jur. 44, § 40. Therefore the trial court properly overruled the nonresident defendants' later motion to strike, in the nature of a general demurrer, raising the question of jurisdiction.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED JULY 10, 1961 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1961.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HARLEY v. HARLEY
(Sep 8, 1961)