Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HARVEY v. LEWIS. In re ESCROW FUNDS.

PER CURIAM.

On May 2, 1961, this Court, in considering the above-styled case, entered the following order:

"On motion of the Court, the briefs and appendices of plaintiffs-appellants Harvey, et al., in the above-styled matters are stricken for gross violations of Court Rule No 67 (particularly sections 1, 2 and 6 thereof). Further, under authority of Court Rule No 70 § 5(b)fn_ the appeals of plaintiffs-appellants Harvey, et al., will be dismissed 60 days from date unless by then appellants have filed briefs and appendices complying with appellate rules."

Court Rules (1945) were amended and certain sections added, October 30, 1956, effective January 2, 1957. For Rule No 67 see 347 Mich xxii, and subsequent amendment effective July 1, 1959, at 355 Mich xiv. For Rule No 70, § 5(b), see 347 Mich xxx, — REPORTER.

Examination of the brief and appendix subsequently submitted by appellants in calendar cause No. 48,785 convinces this Court that no substantial effort at compliance with the above order has been made. As a consequence, in accordance with the said order, appellants' brief and appendix in the case described above are stricken and the appeal is dismissed.

DETHMERS, C.J., and CARR, KELLY, TALBOT SMITH, BLACK, EDWARDS, KAVANAGH, and SOURIS, JJ., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HARVEY v. LEWIS
(Oct 5, 1961)