Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HARRY TOFFEL, TRUSTEE, PETITIONER, v. HAROLD P. BAUGHER AND RUTH D. BAUGHER, HUSBAND AND WIFE, KENNETH L. BAUGHER AND KATHRYN L. BAUGHER, HUSBAND AND WIFE, RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari because our preliminary examination of the record suggested a potential conflict with prior decisions of this Court in State ex rel. Weber v. Register, Fla. 1953, 67 So.2d 619, and, Strasser v. Linn, Fla. 1957, 97 So.2d 458.

After oral argument and a thorough examination of the record and briefs we have the view that the District Court of Appeal has, by its opinion, accurately distinguished the instant case from the prior allegedly conflicting decisions of this Court. Toffel, Trustee v. Baugher et al., Fla.App., 125 So.2d 321.

We therefore conclude that the record under review is devoid of any jurisdictional conflict with prior decisions. Art. V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The writ is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C.J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TOFFEL v. BAUGHER
(Oct 4, 1961)