Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

URMSTON, APPELLANT v. CITY OF NORTH COLLEGE HILL, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Zoning — Restrictions imposed — Reasonableness — Due process.

Per Curiam.

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

URMSTON v. CITY OF NORTH COLLEGE HILL
(Oct 11, 1961)