Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CODDARD MACHINERY COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT REPAIRS, INC., Appellee.

WILSON, Justice.

Plaintiff sued on a verified account. Defendant's unverified answer pleaded payment and accord and satisfaction. The court concluded that in the absence of verified denial under Rule 185, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, defendant was 'not entitled to offer any defense as pleaded', withdrew the case from the jury and rendered judgment on the pleadings for plaintiff.

This was error. Even in the absence of a sworn denial, under the Rule, defendant's pleaded defenses in the nature of confession and avoidance were available. Yelton v. Bird Lime Cement Co., Tex.Civ.App., 161 S.W.2d 353, syl. 6, writ ref. w.m.; J.M. Radford Gro. Co. v. Porter, Tex.Civ.App., 17 S.W.2d 145, 147, writ dis.; Glasco v. Frazer, Tex.Civ.App., 225 S.W.2d 633, 635, writ dis.; McConnon Co. v. Klenk, Tex.Civ.App., 11 S.W.2d 222, 223; American Druggists Synd. V. Holt Drug Co., Tex.Civ.App., 272 S.W. 508, 509; Queen City Motor Co. v. Texas Auto Supply Co., Tex.Civ.App., 241 S.W. 212, 214 and cases therein cited. Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GODDARD MACHINERY CO. v. INDUSTRIAL
(Oct 26, 1961)