Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Frederick Klaessig argued the cause for the appellant. Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Stanley U. Phares, attorney).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Frederick Klaessig argued the cause for the appellant. Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Stanley U. Phares, attorney).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

CLINTON DIXON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. HOLLEY SMITH,RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

DIXON v. HOLLEY SMITH
(Oct 23, 1961)