Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Physicians — Malpractice action — Evidence — Trial to court and judgment for plaintiff — Reversal by Court of Appeals.
Per Curiam.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
ZIMMERMAN, acting C.J., RADCLIFF, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.
ZIMMERMAN, J., sitting in the place and stead of WEYGANDT, C.J.
RADCLIFF, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of ZIMMERMAN, J.