Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

William Othar KITCHENS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that although no motion to suppress the evidence found by the alleged illegal search was made prior to trial, such motion was made and passed upon by the trial court at the trial. The procedure followed fully complies with the requirements of Rule 41(e), Federal Rules Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. We find no error in the manner in which this matter was handled by the trial court or in his decision thereabout.

No other errors appearing, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KITCHENS v. UNITED STATES
(Dec 6, 1961)