AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARVIN VAN DUYNE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CALDWELL MOTORS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the County Court affirming the judgment entered in the Workmen's Compensation Division in favor of respondent because the Division did not have jurisdiction of the claim petition, is affirmed for the reasons stated by County Judge Mills. As he observed, the filing of a claim petition within the time prescribed by R.S. 34:15-51 is a jurisdictional requirement. Schwarz v. Federal Shipbuilding Dry Dock Co., 29 N.J. Super. 374 , 376 ( App. Div. 1954); Scaglione v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., 46 N.J. Super. 363, 368 ( App. Div. 1957).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VAN DUYNE v. CALDWELL MOTORS
(Dec 20, 1961)