AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of S.O.S. SHEET METAL CO., Inc., Debtor-Appellee, Hackensack Plumbing Supply Co., Appellant. In the Matter of HUDIK-ROSS CO., Inc. (NEW YORK), Debtor, Hudik-Ross Inc. (New Jersey), Debtor-Appellee, Hackensack Plumbing Supply Co., Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Hudik-Ross Co. Inc. (New York), Hudik-Ross Inc. (New Jersey) and S.O.S. Sheet Metal Co. Inc., filed petitions for an arrangement in the District Court for the Southern District of New York. Hackensack Plumbing Supply Co., a creditor of Hudik-Ross (New Jersey) and S.O.S., made application under § 32 of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C.A. § 55) for an order transferring the proceedings, insofar as they relate to Hudik-Ross (New Jersey) and S.O.S., to the District Court for the District of New Jersey. This application was denied. We affirm that disposition.

A motion under § 32 is addressed to the sound discretion of the judge. While discretion to retain jurisdiction "in the interest of justice" should be exercised with great caution and in few cases, the reasons given by Judge McGohey in the present case are sufficient to support the result which he reached.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF SHEET METAL CO
(Dec 18, 1961)