AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Guy B. IACONA, etc., et al., Defendants, and Ralph Grasso, Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The dispositive question on this appeal is whether the district judge abused his discretion in refusing to charge appellee with interest on the amount due on its payment bond from the date of filing suit until the cash was paid into court. Despite the impressive argument on behalf of appellant, under the facts we must conclude that the district judge acted within his discretion in deciding as he did.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY v. IACONA
(Jan 24, 1962)