Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Belsey Unemployment Compensation Case.

Unemployment Compensation — Availability for suitable work — Claimant receiving Social Security benefits — Unavailability for work with annual earnings in excess of $1,200 — Unemployment Compensation Law.

In an unemployment compensation case, in which it appeared that claimant, who was receiving Social Security benefits, indicated that he was not available for work where his annual earnings would exceed $1,200, the maximum amount he could earn and still collect Social Security benefits, it was Held that the compensation authorities properly concluded that claimant was not attached to the labor market and was therefore disqualified from receiving benefits under § 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.

Argued December 14, 1961.

OPINION BY WOODSIDE, J., January 16, 1962:

In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, referee and the board all concluded that the claimant was not attached to the labor market and was therefore disqualified from receiving benefits under Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P. S. § 801(d).

The claimant was last employed by the Curtis Publishing Company, Philadelphia. He was involuntarily retired by that company on December 30, 1960. On September 29, 1960, the claimant became sixty-five years of age and began receiving Social Security benefits in the sum of $120 per month.

On February 15, 1961, claimant completed his unemployment compensation forms. He indicated on these forms that he was not available for work where his annual earnings would exceed $1200. This amount is the maximum the claimant could earn and still collect Social Security benefits.

Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, supra, provides: "Compensation shall be payable to any employe who is or becomes unemployed, and who — (d) Is able to work and available for suitable work: . . ."

The claimant removed the restrictions limiting his earnings on June 1, 1961, but this appeal involves the compensable weeks prior to that date, and is governed by the Barron Unemployment Compensation Case, 192 Pa. Super. 353, 161 A.2d 630 (1960). In that case, at page 355, this Court said: "As the claimant desired only such employment as would limit her wages to $1200 per year, the board properly concluded that she was not available for suitable work and was, therefore, ineligible for compensation under § 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, supra."

Decision affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BELSEY UNEMPL. COMPENSATION CASE
(Jan 16, 1962)