Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of LORETTA RICHTER et al., Petitioners-Respondents, v. SEYMOUR R. THALER, Appellant, and JAMES M. POWER et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents.

Order affirmed, without costs. We read section 138 of the Election Law as mandating that a nominating petition shall include a Committee to Fill Vacancies. There can be no question as to legislative intent in view of the fact that 40 years ago, when committees to fill vacancies were by law permissive, the Legislature amended the statute so as to provide that independent nominating petitions "shall" provide for such committees (L. 1922, ch. 588; Election Law, former § 137 [now § 138]). No opinion.

Concur: Judges DYE, FROESSEL, BURKE, FOSTER and HUNT. Judges FULD and MacAFFERfn_ dissent and vote to reverse upon the ground that to affirm here and to hold invalid the independent nominating petition of appellant Thaler is to permit technicality and literalness to run riot. The Legislature could never have intended such a result as this.

Designated pursuant to section 5 of article VI of the State Constitution in the temporary absence of Chief Judge DESMOND and Judge VAN VOORHIS.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF RICHTER v. THALER
(Feb 16, 1962)