AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CHARLES BATTISTA, Respondent, v. IDA LIUZZI et al., Appellants, and CHARLES BATTISTA et al., Respondents.

Order entered on June 20, 1958 and resettled order entered on September 11, 1958 unanimously modified on the law and the facts to strike the second and third decretal paragraphs of said orders, and to strike all language in the first decretal paragraphs following the words "is granted", and is otherwise affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants. "[T]he judicial sale of real property must conform to the judgment to sell and the terms of sale may not deviate therefrom". ( Zouppas v. Yannikidou, 16 A.D.2d 52, 55; Becker v. Muehlig, 221 App. Div. 512, affd. 248 N.Y. 543; cf. Dicianni v. Wrong, 224 App. Div. 621.) On the argument of this appeal able counsel for the appellants frankly, and commendably, stated that they were seeking only the reimbursement of taxes paid in disobedience to the terms of the judgment, and the repayment of a duplicated interest payment. Undoubtedly a like fair and co-operative attitude by others intimately concerned would lead to an early resolution of the differences which exist, and expedite the obtaining of necessary judicial approval. Settle order on notice.

Concur — Rabin, J.P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BATTISTA v. LIUZZI
(Mar 27, 1962)