Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

HAYNER v. BURNS ET UX

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

In his abstract and brief plaintiff states that this is a proceeding in equity for the dissolution of a partnership and an accounting. It was claimed that plaintiff and defendant Robert Burns formed a partnership to exploit some mining claims in Colorado.

At the conclusion of the trial and later by a written opinion, the trial court found a complete lack of any evidence sustaining plaintiff's claim. We agree with the court. The record is devoid of any evidence to establish a claim of right of any kind in favor of plaintiff against defendants. The facts are of interest only to the parties. They do not justify statement here.

Decree affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAYNER v. BURNS ET UX
(Apr 4, 1962)