AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

RUTH NOBLE, Respondent, v. SESSUE K. HAYAKAWA, Appellant.

Order, entered on January 17, 1961, granting plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint and denying defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, the motion to amend denied and the cross motion to dismiss granted, with $10 costs. In this action to recover a balance due on a note executed in 1931, the plaintiff did nothing for 20 months after the joinder of issue at which time she made the instant motion to amend the complaint by adding a new cause of action. In the context of this case a 20-month delay without a satisfactory explanation requires that the complaint be dismissed. In view of the disposition of the cross motion the motion to amend the complaint must be denied.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NOBLE v. HAYAKAWA
(Apr 3, 1962)