Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. James F. Carroll, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C. (both appointed by this court), was on the brief, for
  • Mr. Judah Best,
  • U.S.
  • , with whom
  • David C. Acheson, U.S.
  • , Nathan J. Paulson
  • Harold H. Titus,
  • U.S.
  • , were on the brief, for
Judges
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • Charles Fahy
  • George Thomas Washington
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. James F. Carroll, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C. (both appointed by this court), was on the brief, for
  • Mr. Judah Best,
  • U.S.
  • , with whom
  • David C. Acheson, U.S.
  • , Nathan J. Paulson
  • Harold H. Titus,
  • U.S.
  • , were on the brief, for
Judges
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • Charles Fahy
  • George Thomas Washington
See more information ...
Smart Summary

James W. HAWKINS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a conviction of robbery. Counsel appointed by this court contend that certain evidence was erroneously admitted. Appellant's trial counsel introduced this evidence. We think its admission should not, in the circumstances of this case, lead us to reverse the conviction by virtue of the plain error rule, F.R.Crim.P. [rule] 52(b), 18 U.S.C.A.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

HAWKINS v. UNITED STATES
(Apr 5, 1962)