HEARD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 2924, 2925.

Attorney(S)

B. Dabney Fox, Washington, D.C., for
Ted D. Kuemmerling,
Counsel, with whom Chester H. Gray,
Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal
Counsel,
Hubert B. Pair,
Counsel, were on the brief, for

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 2924, 2925.

Attorney(S)

B. Dabney Fox, Washington, D.C., for
Ted D. Kuemmerling,
Counsel, with whom Chester H. Gray,
Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal
Counsel,
Hubert B. Pair,
Counsel, were on the brief, for

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

James M. HEARD, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of disorderly conduct and drinking in public. He contends here that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. The record convinces us that appellant's contention is without merit.

Code 1961, 22-1107.

Code 1961, 25-128.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

James M. HEARD, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.

Comments