AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of MYRON M. SPARBER, an Attorney, Respondent. CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, the NEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS' ASSOCIATION and the BRONX COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, Petitioner.

Per Curiam.

In this disciplinary proceeding the respondent was admitted to practice on March 21, 1949 at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Judicial Department. On April 3, 1962 respondent was convicted by a jury of a violation of section 1632 of the Penal Law, which is a felony under New York State law. In consequence of such conviction, and pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 Jud. of the Judiciary Law, the respondent has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law or to be competent to practice law in this State. Accordingly, the respondent should be disbarred from the practice of law. ( Matter of Ginsberg, 1 N.Y.2d 144.)

RABIN, J.P., VALENTE, McNALLY, STEVENS and EAGER, JJ., concur.

Respondent struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 Jud. of the Judiciary Law of the State of New York.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SPARBER
(May 29, 1962)