Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Folsom E. Drummond, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Harry A. Toulmin, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for
  • Mr. J.E. Armore,
  • , with whom Mr. Clarence W. Moore, Solicitor, U.S. Patent Office, was on the brief, for
Judges
  • Wilbur Kingsbury Miller
  • James Skelly Wright
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Folsom E. Drummond, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Harry A. Toulmin, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for
  • Mr. J.E. Armore,
  • , with whom Mr. Clarence W. Moore, Solicitor, U.S. Patent Office, was on the brief, for
Judges
  • Wilbur Kingsbury Miller
  • James Skelly Wright
See more information ...
Smart Summary

The COMMONWEALTH ENGINEERING COMPANY OF OHIO and Carl Berger, Appellants, v. Da

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from the denial of a patent application is wholly without merit. The trial judge, in a de novo proceeding, patiently afforded appellants every opportunity to develop their case. But they failed to show that their frozen blood thawing process would produce the result claimed or be otherwise useful. Accordingly, we affirm on the opinion of the District Court. Commonwealth Engineering Co. v. Ladd, D.D.C., 199 F. Supp. 51.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

COMMONWEALTH ENGINEERING CO. OF OHIO v. LADD
(May 31, 1962)