Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL J. HYNDA, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, on a plea of nolo contendere, was convicted of willful failure to file a federal income-tax return in violation of section 7203, Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 United States Code. He was placed on probation for three years.

On the argument of the order to show cause before us, respondent submitted an affidavit asserting mitigating facts. It is difficult to evaluate ex parte presentations of that kind. Such data should be offered before the Ethics Committee as part of the proceedings before it, and there be subjected to appropriate examination. We appreciate that the practice in this regard has not been uniform and hence respondent is not chargeable with a breach of proper procedure. The matter will be referred to the Ethics Committee for a hearing on the alleged extenuating matters, the testimony and the Committee's findings to be returned to us. Thereupon we will determine the measure of discipline to be imposed. Meanwhile, respondent is suspended from the practice of law until the further order of the court.

For suspension and remandment — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE HYNDA
(Jun 29, 1962)