Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

GIUSEPPE DE NARDIS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. STEVENS CONSTRUCTION CO.,RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division.

Mr. Justice HALL and Mr. Justice HANEMAN vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of Judge Price.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO — 5.

For reversal — Justices HALL and HANEMAN — 2.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DE NARDIS v. STEVENS CONSTRUCTION CO
(Sep 24, 1962)