STATE SEC. v. FEDERATED MUT

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 16860.

Attorney(S)

Fred J. Patz, Lincoln, Neb., made argument for the appellant and Sterling F. Mutz, Lincoln, Neb., was on the brief. F.B. Baylor, Lincoln, Neb., made argument for the appellee and Baylor, Evnen, Baylor Urbom by F.B. Baylor, Lincoln, Neb., was on the brief.

Judges

John Benjamin Sanborn
George Scott Register

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

STATE SECURITIES COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Nebraska, Appellant, v. FEDERATED MUTUAL IMPLEMENT AND HARDWARE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and admitted to do business in the State of Nebraska, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment for the defendant (appellee) in this diversity case governed by Nebraska law and tried to Judge John W. Delehant without a jury. He has written an exhaustive opinion, reported in D.C., 204 F. Supp. 207, to which we can add nothing. That opinion and the briefs of the parties have convinced us that the judgment appealed from represents, at the very least, a permissible conclusion with respect to a doubtful question of Nebraska law, which this Court will not reverse. Homolla v. Gluck, 8 Cir., 248 F.2d 731, 733; Weiby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 8 Cir., 273 F.2d 327, 331; Village of Brooten v. Cudahy Packing Company, 8 Cir., 291 F.2d 284, 301.

Affirmed.

STATE SECURITIES COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Nebraska, Appellant, v. FEDERATED MUTUAL IMPLEMENT AND HARDWARE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and admitted to do business in the State of Nebraska, Appellee.

Comments