NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD. v. CUSTOMER CTRL

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 26, 27, Dockets 27394, 27479.

Attorney(S)

Marion Griffin, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Rosanna A. Blake and Seymour Strongin, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Joseph A. Byrne, Jr., of Nurnberg, Byrne Klein, New York City (Francis X. McDermott, of Nurnberg, Byrne Klein, New York City, on the brief), for respondent.

Judges

Charles Edward Clark
Leonard Page Moore
John Joseph Smith

Acts

Labor — Labor-Management Relations — National Labor Relations — Unfair Labor Practices

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CUSTOMER CONTROL, INC., Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In these two cases the National Labor Relations Board found that respondent had violated § 8(a)(1), (3), (4), (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), (3), (4), (5). The Board may exercise the full extent of its statutory jurisdiction in any case, N.L.R.B. v. Pease Oil Co., 2 Cir., 279 F.2d 135, 137-138, and its assumption of jurisdiction here was proper. Concerning the merits, ample evidence exists to justify the Board's finding that the discharge of respondent's three pressmen, who were attempting to unionize, resulted from their union activity and, in one case, from the pressman's testimony in a Board hearing regarding the discharge of the other two. Further, the Board's conclusion that the pressmen constituted an appropriate bargaining unit was warranted.

Enforcement orders will issue in both cases.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CUSTOMER CONTROL, INC., Respondent.

Comments