Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES H. SMITH, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW OF NEW JERSEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the testimony and the report of the Ethics Committee in this matter, as well as the sympathetic exposition made by the Committee on oral argument before us, and do not feel in view of all the circumstances that the case is one warranting disciplinary action.

For dismissal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACORS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE SMITH
(Nov 5, 1962)