AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JANICE DE GROES, Respondent, v. ARNOLD DE GROES, Appellant.

Order, entered on April 17, 1962, granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting plaintiff's motion to dismiss the counterclaim, unanimously affirmed, and the judgment entered on said order on April 25, 1962, is likewise affirmed, with costs to the respondent. We do not reach the question as to whether the cases of Cohen v. Cohen ( 3 N.Y.2d 813) and Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris ( 5 N.Y.2d 317) are controlling. In our opinion the affidavits are insufficient to present a triable issue even on the question of the fraud alleged. Nor is there a triable issue raised with respect to the claim of coercion. In Hanrog Distr. Corp. v. Hanioti ( 10 Misc.2d 659, 660) Mr. Justice SHIENTAG said that "A shadowy semblance of an issue is not enough to defeat the motion." There is no more than that here.

Concur — Rabin, J.P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DE GROES v. DE GROES
(Nov 20, 1962)