Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Whitemarsh Township Authority, Appellant, v. Elwert.

Municipal Claims — Sewers — Assessments — Front foot rule — Municipal authority having only one sewer district — The Second Class Township Code.

In an action of scire facias sur municipal lien brought by plaintiff authority to enforce a lien arising from construction of a sanitary sewer, in which it appeared that plaintiff, a municipal authority, whose entire operations were contained within only one duly constituted sewer district, first adopted a resolution which provided for the assessment of sewer construction costs on the front foot rule, and, subsequently, adopted a supplemental resolution providing for assessment according to the extent of benefits as determined by a jury of view where, in the opinion of the authority, an assessment by the front foot rule could not legally be made or would not adequately measure the benefit to any property; that plaintiff sent a bill to defendants computed, in form, on the front foot rule but actually in excess of the amount which would be due under that rule; and that the court below, holding that under The Second Class Township Code of May 1, 1933, P.L. 103, as amended, the authority, having created only one sewer district, could not elect, at its discretion, to apply both methods of assessment, that the supplemental resolution providing for assessment under either the front foot rule or the benefit rule was therefore illegal, and that assessments could be made against defendants only pursuant to the first resolution, providing for the front foot rule, granted defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings and ordered stricken off the writ of scire facias; it was Held that the order of the court below should be affirmed.

Argued September 12, 1962.

OPINION PER CURIAM, November 15, 1962:

The order of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge DANNEHOWER of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, as reported in 28 Pa. D. C.2d 368.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHITEMARSH TWP. AUTH. v. ELWERT
(Nov 15, 1962)