AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HUMBLE OIL REFINING COMPANY, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No. 35662.)

Per Curiam.

One of the surest guides in measuring damages occasioned by a partial taking of real property is the diminution in rental value resulting from the taking, that is, the difference in value before and after the taking. (See Orgel, Valuation under Eminent Domain [2d ed., 1953], ch. IV, p. 225 et seq., particularly §§ 64-65, pp. 290-302.) In this case, use of the capitalization method to assess the loss in such rental value — a method not employed by the Appellate Division — demonstrates that the ultimate finding made by that court is supported by the weight of the evidence. (Cf. Matter of Port of N.Y. Auth., 2 N.Y.2d 296, 301; Sunnybrook Realty Co. v. State of New York, 9 N.Y.2d 960.)

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HUMBLE OIL REFINING COMPANY v. STATE OF NEW YORK
(Dec 31, 1962)