AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of SWAN-FINCH OIL CORPORATION, Keta Gas and Oil Company, Swan-Finch Petro Chemical Corporation, Debtors.

PER CURIAM.

This is one of a series of proceedings in the complicated affairs of the debtors in the Chapter X bankruptcy of the debtors described in the title of this case. Under the circumstances we think a reversal of this order might render nugatory and futile further action by Judge Palmieri. See Ferguson v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 1961, 288 F.2d 665, affirming sub nom. Ferguson v. Birrell, S.D.N.Y., 1960, 190 F. Supp. 506; McDonnell v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 1961, 297 F.2d 731, affirming, S.D.N.Y., 1961, 196 F. Supp. 496; Pettit v. Doeskin Products, Inc., 2 Cir., 1959, 270 F.2d 95, rehearing denied, 270 F.2d 699, cert. denied, 362 U.S. 910, 80 S.Ct. 660, 4 L.Ed.2d 618; Saltzman v. Birrell, S.D.N.Y., 1957, 156 F. Supp. 538.

The appeal is from the order of November 30, 1962, appointing a receiver of the premises at 1050 Park Avenue, New York City. We affirm. See opinion below filed November 7, 1962, 213 F. Supp. 638.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SWAN-FINCH OIL CORPORATION
(Jan 16, 1963)