Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ALEXANDER J. VASEL

Since the defendant failed to file a brief, his appeal was dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was found guilty of operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (General Statutes § 14-227) and has appealed from the judgment rendered, assigning as error that he was not, upon all the evidence, guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the judgment was contrary to law and against the evidence.

There was no request for a finding of facts and no finding was made. See Cir. Ct. Rule 7.31.1. A transcript of the evidence was presented for the purpose of this appeal.

The defendant did not file a brief in accordance with Circuit Court Rule 7.45.1. No claim of error, not presented in a written brief duly filed, need be considered. Cir. Ct. Rule 7.47.3. The defendant having failed to file a brief, the appeal is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. VASEL
(Feb 28, 1963)